DeLong, Christina September 20, 2017
Searching for answers
Charles M. Blow, “Library
Visit, Then Held at Gunpoint,” New York Times, Opinion Pages, Dated (2016,
January 26). “Charles M. Blow, in his piece “Library Visit, Then Held at
Gunpoint published in the New York Times,” talks through his account of “This
is how my son remembers it.” Where at Yale University, an all American private
Ivy League college, campus police actions leave a concerned father and myself
searching for answers after January's incident. In which, Yale campus police
officer detained and held Charles M. Blow, son, at gunpoint. Another headline,
but graciously a different ending. The time for a new overhaul in police
protocol is now. Searching for justice and answers should never come "few
and far between."
Time after time I've read stories very
similar headlines to Charles M. Blow sons interaction with police officers,
which in return left me compelled to react with great concern. We must bridge
the line of trust between the public and police officers, instead of further
dividing citizens from police who are sworn in to protect the public. I am in
complete disagreement in the arriving Yale campus police officer tactic when he
“raised his weapon” at Charles M. Blow son, and ordered him to the ground. Was
it essential for the Yale campus police officer to draw his weapon? I think the
officers’ approach was reckless, clearly the injustice, and lacked controlled
training. We all have rights, and the Yale police officer violated the rights
of the son of Charles M. Blow and should be held accountable for acting
prematurely. When will the problematic issue of police vs. public come to an
end?
There needs to be a revision of police
protocol, to prevent circumstantial stops on the innocent. The returning
officer then “asked me what my name was, what school I went to” just to be told
“get up” and never mentioning why he retrieved his weapon and ordering the Yale
student to the ground. Protocols are in place to ensure police follow them, but
by campus police not informing the Yale student why he was asked to stop while
held at gunpoint does not seem like a standard protocol that I've encountered
before. The Yale campus police officer should have provided answers following
his immediate request for Charles M. Blow son to "get up" to begin
with. Men, women, and children need to feel
safe again when approached by officers. In the meantime, as if the first
incident with the Yale office wasn’t enough, the officer then “asked him to
turn around so he could see the back of his jacket” as if the first view of the
Yale students back when face down on the concrete was not enough. Did it take
an approaching female officer to add clarity to Charles M. Blow son question?
“I told her that an officer had just stopped me and pointed his gun at me and
that I wanted to know what this was all about.” Then “she explained students
had called about a burglary suspect who fit Charles M. Blow sons’ description”
do I know why, but not in agreement with how the Yale campus police detained
and held Charles M. Blow son at gunpoint.
Growing up I was raised to see good in
everyone and dreamed of becoming “one outstanding police officer. With the
promise to serve and protect. But, after seeing the effect guns, the public,
and police had on families. Then, did I realize very quickly how one quick
judgment could tear a family’s world apart? No one should feel what Charles M.
Blow felt the evening his son, a third-year student at Yale called and
explained how a Yale campus police officer detained and held him at gunpoint.
Never will the search for answers stop. Today was Charles M. Blow son, tomorrow
maybe you, or possibly me.
In conclusion, a third-year Yale
University student is left horrified that frightful night. His simple college
walks back to his dorm stop mattering because apprehending a burglary suspect
matching his description took center stage over his lawful rights. You pull
your weapon in self-defense, and or fear of threat, not because you wear a
badge, or only because you can. One's Rights were broken, and as I search for
answers, I am left mortified. No parent should have to search for answers as to
why their son is “at the wrong end of a gun barrel, face down on the concrete”
with little to no answers.
.
Hearing your views about the police officer is interesting , and how you explain to us it is their sworn duty to protect the public.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you explained your views about the situation.
ReplyDeleteYou made some very good points in this blog and explained your views very well.
ReplyDelete